Changelog

Follow along with Graphmatik updates and improvements.
Back to updates

v.0.1.0

January 11, 2025

Featuring Star Bars

An elegant way to visualize significant differences in your data.
Bar chart with a stacked starbar trace showing statistically significant results

Annotate your statistics with Graphmatik

With version 0.1.0 of Graphmatik, whenever you run a statistical analysis on row or column charts, star bars will automatically be plotted when you tab over to the chart workspace.

Star bars are a great way to visually represent significant differences in your data. Each individual bar depicts a comparison between 2 groups and the number of stars indicates the corresponding p-value.

  1. * represents a p-value <= 0.05
  2. ** represents a p-value <= 0.01
  3. *** represents a p-value <= 0.001
  4. **** represents a p-value <= 0.0001

Star bars settings

After running a statistical analysis, you can customize your star bars by accessing the settings menu.

Click the settings button inside the properties panel of the chart workspace

Inside the settings menu you can:

  • toggle star bars on/off.
  • switch between the fast or optimize stacking algorithm.
  • set the p-value cutoff to 0.1, 0.05, 0.01, 0.001
the optimize method will find the optimal order of comparisons to reduce the height of the star bars trace.

How can I show insignifcant results?

Typically any comparison between groups that doesn't show a * is considered not significant. That said, there are times you may want to highlight insignificance.

  • If you have a large effect size, but low statistical power. You may want to describe a "trend".
  • If you have an effect that looks significant, but is in fact not.

If you select a p-value cutoff of 0.1 you will have the option to show insignifance as:

  • "ns" --> not significant
  • "0.061" --> as a number rounded to 3 decimal places

Be careful with "trends". A P value does not define a study's worth nor prestige. Using words like "trends towards significance" or "nearly significant" can introduce bias & subjectivity in scientific reporting. Rather discuss observed differences in terms of their effect size, variability, & limitations (eg. statistical power).